The women, all over the age of 65, argued they were especially vulnerable to the health impacts of climate change. The European Court of Human Rights agreed.
Read Also
- Russia’s Putin eyes greater support from China for Ukraine war effort
- Middle East Crisis: First Supplies Enter Gaza Through Pier Built by U.S. Military
- PIGS Are Flying Again. Can they Stay Aloft?
- Extension of King Charles free portraits scheme upsets unions and mosques
- Deadly Clashes in New Caledonia Raise Fears of Civil War
- French police kill armed man suspected of setting fire to synagogue
- New York City said 'no injuries' at Columbia arrests; students' medical records say otherwise
- French police kill man suspected of setting fire to synagogue in Rouen
- Looking for lichen: Church of England launches search for life on gravestones
- Trump and Johnson spread unfounded fears by urging non-citizen voting ban
Latest Time Magazine
- French Police Fatally Shoot an Armed Man Suspected of Setting Fire to a Synagogue
- Vatican Announces New Norms to Authenticate Claims Like Divine Visions and Weeping Statues
- Vladimir Putin’s Pomp-Filled China Trip Underscores the Limits of Western Pressure
- 3 Australian League Soccer Players Arrested Over Alleged Yellow Card-Fixing Scheme
- Pro-Palestinian Student Protesters Celebrated for ‘Moral Clarity’ at ‘The People’s Graduation’
- Texas Governor Pardons Ex-Army Sergeant Convicted of Killing an Air Force Veteran at a Black Lives Matter Protest in 2020
- An Australian Billionaire Tried to Suppress an Aboriginal Artist’s Unflattering Portrait of Her. It’s Only Drawn More Attention
- How TIME Chose Its Spring 2024 Class of Next Generation Leaders
- 2023 Was the Worst Year for Internet Shutdowns Globally, New Report Says
- Dutch Government Veers to Far Right With Newly Formed Coalition Dominated by Wilders