A study by Princeton University shows that benchmarks made for AI agents don't account for costs and are prone to overfitting.
Read Also
- Google AI, ChatGPT, Meta AI, Mistral: All These AI Tools Nearly Unlimited for $39 Lifetime
- Trees' own beneficial microbiome could lead to discovery of new treatments to fight citrus greening disease
- What to read this weekend: Preventing an asteroid apocalypse, and Cult of the Lamb’s first arc wraps up
- Android phones have started receiving crucial anti-theft features
- Disney’s “Alien Encounter” Attraction Is Reborn as a Gory Play
- Massive generational gap: Gen Z flocks to multiplayer, while 55+ sticks to single-player
- You can slap a Pixel Watch 2 on your wrist for just $224 right now
- The Rings of Power creators respond to controversial Dark Wizard theory
- Rad Power Bikes RadWagon 5 e-bike review: a versatile anything hauler
- Tineco Prime Day Big Deal Days discounts: Save on floor cleaners
Latest VentureBeat
- PlayStation bug showed what gamers really think of ads | Kaser Focus
- How open-source LLMs enable security teams to stay ahead of evolving threats
- Why MFA alone won’t protect you in the age of adversarial AI
- The future of cooling: How Invensify’s innovative technology is set to disrupt multiple industries
- Apple releases Depth Pro, an AI model that rewrites the rules of 3D vision
- Apple releases Depth Pro, an AI model that rewrites the rules of 3D vision
- EndlessAI unveils Lloyd: the world’s first video AI assistant for smartphones
- Tencent and Guillemot family considering buyout of Ubisoft | Bloomberg report
- CleanPlay aims to reduce carbon footprint of gaming | The DeanBeat
- Meta enters AI video wars with powerful Movie Gen set to hit Instagram in 2025