Most of the revisions aim to better define the term “booster” and what constitutes the pay-for-play inducements the NCAA hopes to eliminate.
House v. NCAA settlement revises language around NIL in new filing
Read Also
- Scheffler fires back, says Kim 'poked the bear'
- Dodgers wrap up 11th NL West title in 12 years
- Cowboys' Parsons set for MRI after injuring ankle
- What's next for the Chicago Sky, Angel Reese after Teresa Weatherspoon's exit?
- Where to watch Milan vs Lecce live stream, channel, time, lineups, prediction for Serie A match
- Roy Keane gives scathing assessment of Arsenal's tactics against Man City
- Roma Suffer Huge Injury Blow During UEL Clash Against Bilbao
- Supercomputer predicts winners of Champions League
- WSL predictions: Gameweek 2
- “He has everything” – Dutch legend sings praises of sensational Arsenal target who is “an incredibly good player”
Latest The Athletic
- Tottenham Briefing: Dragusin's missed chance, Johnson fires again and Vicario shines
- How Liverpool rebooted Luis Diaz with Slot sessions, tactical tweaks - and a song
- Fantasy Premier League: Playing your wildcard this week? Here's what to consider
- Why Adam Wharton has yet to spark Crystal Palace into life this season
- How Andrew Crofts and Jonas Scheuermann are assisting Fabian Hurzeler at Brighton
- Five games that define Unai Emery becoming Aston Villa's quickest manager to 50 wins
- Wolves need to bring back their style from Manchester City win - and stem the goals
- EA Sports FC 25: Highest-rated players and review of new release
- Why are Newcastle not seeing the best of Alexander Isak so far this season?
- 'Go Miss Fuller!' - Wrexham's defender on her team's return to The Racecourse